Talk:Way of the Five Pecks of Rice/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back soon for a full review! Good luck! CarpetCrawler (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
GA passed
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
VERY well written, excellently sourced, and it definitely looks like a lot of hard work was put into this article. I cannot find any problems with it and thought it was a great read! Well done, and congratulations! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)