Jump to content

Talk:Wave 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWave 1 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 4, 2016Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 10, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after synthwave producer Com Truise made his third extended play Wave 1, he said he had not realized it was really a reflection of the previous few months of his life?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wave 1/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 01:58, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Infobox

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Background and composition

[edit]

Paragraph 1

[edit]

Paragraph 2

[edit]
  • Again, add the release year for the album Galactic Melt please
    • It's there, read the first sentence again: "Maintaining the bright and danceable feel from Com Truise's 2011 debut studio album Galactic Melt"
  • Rest looks great! :)

Tracks

[edit]
  • I think a better title for this section would be "Composition" or "Songs"; but I guess this is just personal preference

Paragraph 1

[edit]

Paragraph 2

[edit]

Promotion and release

[edit]
  • Nada :)

Critical reception

[edit]

Paragraph 1

[edit]
  • Reword first sentence to "Wave 1 received positive reviews from music critics, with the EP..."
  • State what Metacritic's score means; elaborate further
  • "Pitchfork Media's Paul Thompson noted that the producer's attention to perfecting every detail instead of inventing new ideas on Wave 1 caused the album to lack any sort of feeling, but he concluded that "by burrowing down into a few key sounds rather than stiffly approximating a dozen-plus, the intermittently funky, unshakably finicky Wave 1 is a mostly welcome return."[6]" --> I'm not exactly sure what the middle of the sentence is trying to convey; could you reword this as well? It's rather as long as well; you could likely get the same message across without including the entirety of the quote

Paragraph 2

[edit]

Tracklist

[edit]

Charts

[edit]
  • Looks good

Other notes

[edit]

End of GA Review:

[edit]

A good article with some minor issues that have been explained above. I will place the article on hold for seven days to allow for changes. Please alert me when the issues are taken care of; thanks a lot! Carbrera (talk) 02:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great work @EditorE:! Definitely will be passing now. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 16:57, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]