Talk:Wath marshalling yard

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks references.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Wath marshalling yard is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article needs to say what country this marshalling yard is in. Don't assume that everyone who reads it is from the UK. 130.76.96.15 17:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

done ;) Pickle 19:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal

I would like to propose that Wath engine shed be merged into this article for the following reasons:

The engine shed article is essentially no more than a statement on the shed location plus with some context on the line and marshalling yard;
The engine shed does not seem notable enough for a standalone article, other than in association with the marshalling yard; and
It will assist readers by locating all the information about this site in the one article.

The marshalling yard article is the longer of the two but it is not too long for the merger to create any problems for readability. If the merger proceeds Wath engine shed would redirect to Wath marshalling yard.

If there is something I have missed about the engine shed or there are any disagreements with this proposal, please let me know. Euryalus 02:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any comments over the last month I have gone ahed and done the merge. The engine shed information already appeared in the marshalling yard piece except for a minor point about the shed location near the Moor Lane Bridge, which I have now transferred. The merge can of course be undone if a good case is made - if there are opposing views then let's discuss here. Euryalus (talk) 00:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wath marshalling yard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025055143/http://www.gcr-rollingstocktrust.co.uk/articles_output.asp?id=8&checkSource=sitemap to http://www.gcr-rollingstocktrust.co.uk/articles_output.asp?id=8&checkSource=sitemap

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]