Talk:Waterpark College

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Non Notable Alumni

The Alumni section is for alumni who have actually achieved some level of notability. It is not a section for ego-tripping. Creating a small topical website or a forum is not in itself notable. There are millions of such websites. Creating something like Google etc is notable. Being a broadcaster with decades of broadcasting experience and immediate name recognition is notable. Jmccormac (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And Jmccormac, you may not know this, but the convention on Wikipedia is that only people with articles get included in such lists. Drmies (talk) 16:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jmccormac (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC) Here in the real world, the governments and the history books and the media decide who is notable. You asked for an article (implying Wikipedia) and I provided a link to the Irish government's reference along with a Wikipedia reference to put it in context for you. There are even more in legal works and even newspapers citing Hearne's work and position in drafting the 1937 constitution. Jmccormac (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're not in the real world. You could, of course, simply have written the article. Drmies (talk) 16:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I don't see where your source says that he attended Waterpark. Drmies (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, there is a John Hearne who teaches at Waterpark--they're not saying nice things about him, and I hope he pays no attention to those nonsense sites. Drmies (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No I did not write the article. Had I done so, it would flow better. Not everything is in Google and a lot of historical data is still in school year books, newspaper reports and other media. Most of this information is inaccessible to search engines. This makes it somewhat more difficult for people who are probably not professional researchers or even in the same country to check accuracy of articles. Jmccormac (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"It would flow better." Well, thanks. FYI, Google delivered plenty of information to me in the US to write at least a decent stub, even if my "flow" doesn't measure up to your exacting prose standards. Oh, school year books are not reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Google's access to a lot of newspaper archives is somewhat limited because many newspapers charge for access and some of the smaller provincial and local ones would have limited lifespans. They also are more likely to have never digitised their content. School year books are actually quite reliable as they can associate an individual with a particular school in a particular year. They also contain some history of the school and may also contain details on past-pupils who have died during the year. This data can be correlated with the death notices in the media. However this kind of data correlation is probably a bit more than is necessary for the odd Wikipedia article. Jmccormac (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Remember, you distinguished the real world from this one. In this world, yearbooks are not considered reliable sources. But all that's besides the point: there are plenty of sources available via the internet to fill out his article. Drmies (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Waterpark College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070820093904/http://ie.uwc.org:80/news.htm to http://www.ie.uwc.org/news.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:58, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]