	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 17 July 2019 by reviewer Chetsford (talk · contribs).

Dungeons & Dragons Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the Dungeons & Dragons WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dungeons & Dragons-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, or join the discussion, where you can join the project and find out how to help!Dungeons & DragonsWikipedia:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsTemplate:WikiProject Dungeons & DragonsDungeons & Dragons articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

D&D to-do:

view

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Merge : Various articles
Stubs : Dungeoneer's Survival Guide, Swords & Spells, Variant Dungeons & Dragons games, More...
Update : Rewrite to be out-of-universe: Companions of the Hall, Dark Sun, Elf (Dungeons & Dragons)
Verify : add sources to novels planned for merge to List of Dragonlance novels
Other : Collaboration: Dave Arneson, Drow (Dungeons & Dragons)

Sources

Publishers Weekly

In Publishers Weekly's "This Week's Bestsellers: December 3, 2018", Waterdeep: Dungeon of the Mad Mage was #18 for "Hardcover Nonfiction" but the digital reprint of the article does not list that information. In the original issue, this was shown in an image next to the text paragraph. You can see this on Page 13 of the issue. However, http://www.digitalpw.com requires a subscription to view Page 13. I found a copy of the page here which doesn't require a subscription to view: http://images-cdn.dashdigital.com/digitalpw/20181203/data/imgpages/mobile3/0015_ocjmsd.jpg?lm=1547075476000 Sariel Xilo (talk) 19:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, weird! I have seen other instances where the digital copy of something was not exactly the same as the print copy. BOZ (talk) 20:05, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]