Talk:Watercolour (song)

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Watercolour (song) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

a source link cannot be provided due to the fact that yfrog is blocked

times can be assumed from the zane lowe show, especially of watercolour radio edit/instrumental/original

personnel is somewhat obvious —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.251.77 (talk) 20:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

added Ear Storm label, release format is probably going to remain the same:

but this is better than what was before, eh? 110.174.251.77 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.251.77 (talk) 20:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It credits two drummers, the old one and the new one. Did they both have a part to play in it or is that just wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Immersivepreview (talk • contribs) 17:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unencylopedic Material

I do not think that this line constitutes encyclopedic material: "On almost all of the band member's Twitter feeds, they have stated that they "got very wet" in the process of filming the video". This has no reference is vulgar, and it's source ssems to be twitter. Anyhow, I am going to remove the tag and the sentence should we all agree. The Tagging was just to draw some attention to the flaw and make sure it wasn't just paranoid me. ^{(Cheers! Want Anything? Chatty?)}_babylarm 01:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I admit, I was a bit wary of that line myself. I'm all for it. ImmersiveReality (talk) 09:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting error

Can someone fix the massive gap in the "Formats and track listings" section? I'm not experienced enough to figure out why it's doing that. Probably to do with the table width, or something. Talk Chromana 18:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done and done. Thoughts? ImmersiveReality (talk) 13:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]