Jump to content

Talk:Water resource policy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rationale

[edit]

It seems that water policy and regulation is quite disorganized here on WP. I think there is a role for an article on WRP as developed in US Europe and Japan and disseminated to global. I may be wrong. See talk.GeoBardRap 02:57, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Water resource policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Water resource policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Water resource policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganizing this article a bit

[edit]

I started reorganizing the issues in water resource policy section. So far I've worked on environmental issues, but I'm also planning on making sections about privatization, water as a human right, and diplomatic issues. Eventually I'm planning on working on the Institutional Participants and Structural Constraints parts as well to add citations and make it less US-focused. If you have any more suggestions, let me know. Gggg2123 (talk) 21:08, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This site cannot be reached Brookewilder (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Brookewilder.

Reference 45 irrelvant

[edit]

This website is not a relevant citation for this piece of information. A more specific citation or a link to a specific article within this website is required. The information cannot be verified using the current citation #45. Brookewilder (talk) 08:53, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction Contains Biased/Opiniated Concluding Sentence

[edit]

"Mitigation and updated water resource policies will require interdisciplinary and international collaboration, including government officials, environmental scientists, sociologists, economists, climate modelers, and activists."

The word "require" suggests that this is the only solution. This could be improved by rephrasing to "could involve" or "could require." As written this sentence excludes other possible methods or mitigation or implementing policy.--Brookewilder (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Reference 66 links to a website that can no longer be found. This information cannot be verified and requires a similar source or removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brookewilder (talkcontribs) 09:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]