Talk:WaterColor, Florida

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Florida may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Florida stub]] on the article page.

If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Florida|class=stub|importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.

Landscape architect

@Graywalls, regarding your recent revert of my edit, I'm not going to reinstate my edit just yet. I do, however, disagree with your edit summary I could cite NYT and say "there is a 7-11" and such, but is it due?

Given that the subject is a planned community, a landscape architect might be WP:DUE info to include. For many such communities, there are separate architects for the buildings and the grounds, and it may be worth mentioning both the building architects and landscape architects. By contrast, a list of commercial name-drops would merely be promotional in most cases and would certainly not be due weight in an article about a community. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius:, have you seen the discussion over at COI/N? That insertion was done by someone who apparently has vested interested to name drop that name into places. There's a fine line between encyclopedic and promotional "who's who". While things absolutely positively must be directed supported in reliable sources, not all verified facts should be included and that's where we're in sort of the grey area. Because the insertion was done by likely promotional effort in the first place, I'm really reluctant to add it back in. Graywalls (talk) 17:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response, @Graywalls—I was unaware of the COIN discussion. In that case, I agree that it might not constitute due weight to include the landscape architect. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius:, the discussion is here. Since promotional public relations editing is a major problem on Wikipedia as a whole, I suggest taking a look and participating if you will. Graywalls (talk) 18:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]