Talk:Wat Buddhapadipa

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Thailand Low‑importance

	Thailand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Which tradition? Secretlondon 11:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha images

I removed the following statements about the Buddha images, because they are dubious and cite no sources as confirmation:

"The green statue is only a copy of a much more valuable statue—the Jade Buddha. The gold statue is not real gold, because that would prevent the Buddhists from touching it; if they did it would break the tenth precept of refraining from touching gold; this is 20 to 30 years old. Lastly, the black statue is the most valuable of the three; it is 800 to 900 years old."

Here are my specific objections:

The green statue is only a copy of a much more valuable statue—the Jade Buddha.

What is the "Jade Buddha"? Do you mean the Emerald Buddha in Wat Phra Kaew in Bangkok? This statement is meaningless without clarification of precisely which icon is being copied.

The gold statue is not real gold, because that would prevent the Buddhists from touching it; if they did it would break the tenth precept of refraining from touching gold; this is 20 to 30 years old.

This is a baffling assertion to make in the context of Thai Buddhism, where gold leaf is regularly applied to sacred images by worshipers as a form of devotion. Real gold is ubiquitous in Thai temples and on Thai Buddha images. The main icon of Wat Traimit in Bangkok even claims to be made of solid gold -- over 5 tons of it! In practice, the precept referred to here is observed only by monks, and it applies only to money.

Lastly, the black statue is the most valuable of the three; it is 800 to 900 years old.

Citation needed.

I do remember reading somewhere how there was a conflict about the installation of the icons which resulted in their current placement. Cate refers to it briefly on p. 150, but I can't find the whole story (it may be elsewhere in her book.)

Juxian (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wat Buddhapadipa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010417000155/http://www.buddhapadipa.org/ to http://www.buddhapadipa.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:07, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]