Talk:Wasteland Angel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk · contribs) 23:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello there. Here are a few things that may need to be improved before I pass or fail this GAN:

• The date formatting in the citations may need to be consistent.
• IGN is a work published by News Corporation, so you may want to include the publisher in the IGN sources as well.

I will check on the other issues later. Good luck, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

• Done. --Odie5533 (talk) 03:57, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

I'm back. Anyways, here are some things that I would like to go over.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The prose is well written, but should the lead be expanded to two or three paragraphs if possible?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All the sources seem to be good enough. All dead citations were replaced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit wars occuring here.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All of the images have FARs and have appropriate use with suitable captions.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I will check to see if this article passes or fails if possible.

Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

• I expanded the lead and split it into 3 paragraphs: [1] --Odie5533 (talk) 23:35, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Also, I think GameRankings might need to be added in as well to summarize the critical reception of the game. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Done --Odie5533 (talk) 02:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

I am passing this article as a GA. Good work! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:45, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for reviewing the article. WP:GAN has the final steps for finishing off the review. Thank you again. --Odie5533 (talk) 13:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)