Talk:Washington Redskins Original Americans Foundation

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

National Football League

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Not Notable

The Original Americans Foundation (OAF), announced only days ago, has received mention in the press entirely because of its role in the Washington Redskins name controversy. Creating a new article for the OAF alone is at best premature.FriendlyFred (talk) 00:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For now, I have added another ref for balance.FriendlyFred (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree strongly. At the absolute minimum, this is worthy of redirection to the main controversy article. Given the immense amount of popular attention it has received, though, I have no doubt that OAF is notable. Xoloz (talk) 22:26, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Main article vs this one

I am continuing to place news of the OAF in the section of the main article, but have no interest is duplicating that effort here.FriendlyFred (talk) 01:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was curious if anything was being done here, which is little. Reverted an anonymous POV deletion.FriendlyFred (talk) 19:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Main article GA status

Trimming the main article on the controversy involved splitting off content, so this article turned out to be needed.

There is a new Washington Post ref which basically rehashes everything.FriendlyFred (talk) 21:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]