Talk:Washington, Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut High‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Affluence"

Washington is the 62nd (out of 187 towns) wealthiest CT town in terms of median household income, and 10th (out of 26) within the county of Litchfield. Not really sure this qualifies it as "among the most affluent" in either the state or county.

http://www.ct.gov/ecd/lib/ecd/economic_data/income/2000_median_hh,_family_&_per_cap_income.xls —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.39.153 (talk) 02:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Washington is primarily a second home to New Yorkers. Their demographic information is not counted in the census. As you can tell by the real estate prices in the town, it is clearly one of the wealthiest towns in the state. 199.168.62.2 (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

architecture and sources

I removed an assertion about Georgian architecture from this article, and User:Kcboling has returned it with edit summary "Historic Districts: re-inserted reference to Georgian architectural style, which is clearly evident in the drawing & photo of the Hill Church, photo of Bill Blass house, & CT Historic Inventory)". The text in the article, referring to the New Preston Hill Historic District is currently that "The structures in this district are built principally in the Georgian style."

I believe that's not accurate now. The Hill church's drawing looks to me like Federal style architecture, focussing on the semi-elliptical window and other features. Indeed, the NRHP nomination for the district (linked in the HD article) describes the church as having Federal architecture and Greek Revival architecture features. Georgian architecture is generally later than Federal/Greek Revival, too. The church was built in 1824, at the era of Federal and Greek Revival. The HD nomination document describes the buildings as being 2 Colonial, 4 Federal, 1 Italianate and 2, 3, 4 being 18th-, 19th-, 20th-century vernacular style.

Possibly some of the 20th century ones could be characterized as Georgian, and it may be that the Bill Blass House is Georgian, based on its photo, but I am not comfortable with asserting that without a source judging it so.

What is the mention of CT Historic Inventory about? Is that a source that does describe the Bill Blass house as being Georgian? --doncram (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had thought the Bill Blass house pic was showing a more modern house, but now i see it is the Newton's Tavern one in photo 1 of the NRHP nom pics. It too is described as being Federal/Greek Revival in style, despite being described as being built c.1900 (which does not make sense to me for those styles). But closer looking at it, it does not look like Georgian Revival or other Georgian, to me. --doncram (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Washington, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111023105358/http://www.nydailynews.com:80/archives/gossip/1999/06/10/1999-06-10_mick_s_a_hit_with_jerry___ki.html to http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/gossip/1999/06/10/1999-06-10_mick_s_a_hit_with_jerry___ki.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]