Talk:Wardington

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

We need more detail!

Hi guys just added some more general info mostly on current services, but theres a whole load of stuff that can still go in here, more detail on the old pubs, the old post office, the chapel which is now 3 seperate houses, local clubs, etc etc

I think we need some sort of structure to the page though..something similar to what i've done with the services bit.

At the moment whilst the intro is good and concise, the history section is just all over the place. Definately need some form of organisation there.

I live in the village so i'll see if i can get some decent pictures up to spice the page up a bit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crackers250 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "History" section is not "all over the place". Each paragraph is in chronological order and tells a different aspect of village history.
Simplicity is a virtue. An article about an English village is unlikely to benefit from layers of sub-sections and sub-headings.
As an encyclopaedia, Wikipedia does not need "spice". Neither is it a village website, nor a directory of local businesses.
I have now added brief descriptions of present and former pubs and the former chapel. A similarly concise account of the village post office would be welcome, but it must have inline citations to verifiable references!
Good photographs of significant local sights in the village would improve the article and be very welcome.

Motacilla (talk) 00:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wardington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121005101829/http://www.achurchnearyou.com/benefice.php?B=27%2F139CW to http://www.achurchnearyou.com/benefice.php?B=27%2F139CW

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]