Talk:War of the Ring (board game)

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle-earth Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Text and/or other creative content from War of the Ring (board game) was copied or moved into War of the Ring (SPI game) with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Fair use rationale for Image:Warofthering.jpg

Image:Warofthering.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SPI split

Is there any real reason why the SPI game is here? The only points of contact between them is the title/license. Other than that, they're very different games, and I don't think the new one borrowed anything from the SPI one.

It also seems ironic that the only reference on the page is for a game that isn't the main subject of the article. T_T --Rindis (talk) 21:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is no real conetion between the two games we should split them up.--Kangaroo2 (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split. Greetings --Heiko (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The old game should have it's own page since it's 2 different games. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.235.251.19 (talk) 11:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Article split to War of the Ring (SPI game), but needs work. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should I upload a file?

I've been working on a sub page that concerns the SPI version of the game should I upload it? Or should I put it on a seperate article?--Kangaroo2 (talk) 22:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Praise

The article for this excellent game has only rules and criticism. I believe the game has been well-received. Perhaps we can include some "critical reception" references to indicate this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austinmohr (talk • contribs) 21:43, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editions and focus (also, notability)

Shouldn't this focus on all editions? Currently, the focus on 'new edition' is a bit weird, with a section about 'previous edition'. Also, is this really a second edition, or a new game? Sources are somewhat confused, not sure if we need a slit between FFG and SPI versions or not. @Guinness323 and BOZ:. FYI, there was a pl edition (both for old and new version), I've added refs to pl wiki article (for the reviews of the old version), but all we have are two and a half low reliability reviews... so notability is still an issue here, and pl sources won't help much. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:47, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]