Talk:War against war

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the War against war article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 25 March 2012 by reviewer Dalisays (talk · contribs).

Military history

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Additional information:
/
	No existing task force includes this article in its scope; to propose a new one, please leave a message on the main project talk page.

A query | transcendental vs confrontational | advocates of both?

. . .

Just a wee query,

The main article was a fascinating introduction to "war on war" themes, thanks to all editors!

It outlines two main approaches, the optimistic transcendental approach, and the more pessimistic confrontational approach.

Query - is there any evidence of advocacy, scholarly or otherwise, advocating for both approaches? Perhaps as a phased approach - confrontation first, to identify the problem; transcendental, secondly, to provide the solution.

I've attempted to find such evidence online, publicly, but I suspect any advocates for a dual, phased approach might only be on record somewhere behind scholastic paywalls, to which I cannot afford access as an independent researcher.

Apologies if this query seems to get too close to the line between discussion of the issue rather than this page itself. But as an outside, non-expert editor, the final quote seems incomplete somehow? As if waiting for a conclusion?

Just some thoughts,

jason

Avaiki (talk) 01:22, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

. . . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avaiki (talk • contribs) 00:47, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]