Talk:Walton sextuplets
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Dead link
[edit]Reference 2 is now a dead link (error: file not found).188.230.248.85 (talk) 11:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The surname problem?
[edit](I suggest this paragraph be removed as it queries and complains about a completely normal situation in Britain and most other places - that when a woman marries she takes her husband's surname. They also seem to think that a rare surname gains some sort of priority for women in such situations - it doesn't).
Why graham walton was managed to replace janets surname leadbetter to walton after the marriage? Are the britains government trying to encourage discrimination against women? Well if a man with more common surname marrie with a woman with a less common surname it would bring some bad omen. And thats it. Cmiiw. 2404:8000:1027:D5FD:F0CE:8622:18DA:568 (talk) 18:00, 2 October 2023 (UTC)