Talk:Walther Collection

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reversion to an earlier, referenced version

I was amazed, an hour or so ago, when I discovered this article. I'm incapable of remaining polite about it. I'd say that it's written in pure art-corporate bullshit.

I was more amazed to glance in its history and learn that I'd been a contributor to this mess (in 2014). Ah, but in 2018 it was radically altered by an editor with the interesting name of "Walthercoll".

I propose to revert it to the state it was in immediately preceding the intervention by "Walthercoll". Its most recent revision had been by 14GTR. Its most vigorous editor since "Walthercoll" has been "Katniss2008", who has come to a sticky end; but perhaps Rathfelder or Lopifalko (or of course anyone else) would like to comment. -- Hoary (talk) 23:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PS I've just noticed that this article was originally created by "WaltherNewYork": his/her/their only edit before being blocked (for the impermissible username) by Daniel Case. -- Hoary (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead ... I'll block Walthercoll too, if they haven't already been blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 01:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case, having expressed myself (above) on this article in a way that arguably does not befit an administrator, I'd better recuse myself from any administrative actions hereabouts. So all I'll say is "Don't let me stop you." -- Hoary (talk) 05:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked Walthercoll, who in any case hadn't edited for over two years. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, revert back to the point described, thus switching polarities between one extreme and another. -Lopifalko (talk) 05:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done! -- Hoary (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The

The name of this institution reminds me of that of the Wallace Collection, to which The Wallace Collection is, properly, a mere redirect. I propose moving this article to "Walther Collection". Any objections? -- Hoary (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done! (Rather obviously.) -- Hoary (talk) 13:39, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]