Talk:Walterdale Bridge

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This stub needs work. I have included the City of Edmonton's link to the project history of the bridge construction, but I would like to work on developing more content, esp. as the bridge is being rebuilt. Ncsjfreed (talk) 00:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)ncsjfreed--Ncsjfreed (talk) 00:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead reference

The 2nd reference (^ "Walterdale Bridge to be rebuilt under simplified plan". Edmontonjournal.com. April 8, 2009. http://www.edmontonjournal.com/Life/Walterdale+Bridge+rebuilt+under+simplified+plan/1476112/story.html. Retrieved 2011-07-07.) no longer links to an active page or article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proudlom (talk • contribs) 20:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Photo Gallery

I added a photo gallery feature and two photos. A few more of the construction or interesting ones of the old + some history would greatly improve this article. Any photos of the main construction camps? Cheers, Kmw2700 (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that New Walterdale Bridge be merged into Walterdale Bridge. The articles are both fairly short and in reviewing the Port Mann Bridge article, both the old a new bridges are mentioned. As part of the merger the old and new bridges could be differentiated by their opening year (2012 and 2017 respectively). -- MuzikMachine (talk) 16:06, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support: @MuzikMachine: Agreed, the new bridge article is extremely small and there's no reason that material can't be included here as well. Nobody calls the newer bridge the "New Walterdale Bridge", so anyone looking for information on the new one would likely end up at the "Walterdale Bridge" article anyway; Therefore WP:COMMONNAME also would support this. - Vanstrat ⁽⁽🗼⁾⁾ 03:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did the merge. Most of the information on the previous article was a duplicate of what was on here as it was. The only things that were different were the infobox and one sentence at the beginning. - Vanstrat ⁽⁽🗼⁾⁾ 05:43, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]