Talk:Walter Ohmsen/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: auntieruth (talk) 18:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I've made some copy edits. please confirm that what I've written is what you meant.
- Checked! Looks good MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- I've made some copy edits. please confirm that what I've written is what you meant.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Nice job on this. I've added a sentence to the lead to establish why this particular man was notable, not only for his decorations. In a couple other places, there was some verb and word choice issue, please check it. Otherwise, I'm ready to pass. auntieruth (talk) 18:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Looks good, Thanks MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:11, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
- Nice job on this. I've added a sentence to the lead to establish why this particular man was notable, not only for his decorations. In a couple other places, there was some verb and word choice issue, please check it. Otherwise, I'm ready to pass. auntieruth (talk) 18:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
