This article was nominated for deletion on 27 February 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Southern California, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of Southern CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California articles
I know the source says the warrant is for it, but criminal forfeiture isn't a crime, and it isn't something you're wanted for... more likely he's wanted for a crime where the penalty is forfeiture. Maybe the warrant says it, but it just doesn't make a whole lot of sense. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 22:02, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think that bulk of changes are reasonable and improve quality of article but, in my opinion, certain elements do give impression of intentional obfuscation. Also, I am not sure on policy and am unable to find applicable guidance at this time but the change being made by a colleague, at the subject's apparent behest, makes me wonder if the edit is toeing line on targeted neutral POV. GrouchDouglass8 (talk) 15:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]