Talk:Wall Street reform

opinionated

Many statements are assumptions and opinions of the editors - not facts (i.e. cause of crisis, "intent of protecting taxpayers money",...).

Many of these statements need to be made "neutral", or eliminated.

--Tapalmer99 (talk) 19:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

dead links

these two links are no longer good (even if they were good, they come from less than neutral sources).

--Tapalmer99 (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wall Street reform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080617084215/http://www.pbs.org:80/newshour/forum/july02/b_ethics.html to http://www.pbs.org/newshour/forum/july02/b_ethics.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)