Talk:Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Darkwarriorblake (talk · contribs) 20:12, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Only small issues to deal with.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Accolades section could use some minor prose to accompany the table.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
What is the ref titled "Hebzucht is legaal geworden"? It's published by someone I can't find on here, assumedly it is a foreign language piece? It has no real detail that I imagine someone could look up to verify the claim it makes, not that it is particularly controversial.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Awaiting clarification or improvement of highlighted ref.

Fixed the ref, added a little text to Accolades... and what image are you talking about? igordebraga ≠ 17:18, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I passed the images, the comment is from the template, I didn't notice it. Reading article... Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK I'm fine with the changes made, congrats for your contribution. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]