Talk:Walking (Thoreau)

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Original research cleanup

This article appears to contain a lot of original research, and no citations. It may even have been copied wholesale from a student essay; the "(Thoreau 1)" MLA style references left in the body text are rather suggestive of this.

I'd like to help cleanup this article when I have time. Suggestions welcome.

68.117.245.236 (talk) 08:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.uwosh.edu/facstaff/barnhill/ES-243/example-of-rhetorical-analysis. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. 68.117.245.236 (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too long?

The entire entry is too long and too subjective, especially the Historical Setting section.David notMD (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Having written on this essay, I entirely agree with your comments. As someone else has commented, this has many marks of being a student's essay or research paper, or the like. But I do not know the etiquette for shortening a piece. I have done edits before, but here, several sections need major work. Who decides when major surgery is necessary and then does it? Thanks for any guidance or comments. Richmilne (talk) 05:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]