Jump to content

Talk:Walkabout (Millennium)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWalkabout (Millennium) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starWalkabout (Millennium) is part of the Millennium (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2012Good article nomineeListed
July 26, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 11, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that when filming "Walkabout", Millennium star Lance Henriksen wanted it to be clear his character was not reckless with medicine?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Walkabout (Millennium)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 17:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Plot: Do they mention the pseudonym? Might be worth a mention
  • Plot: "someone has died" I would just say "someone died"
  • Plot: "One night years earlier" -> "One night, years earlier"
  • Plot: "That evening, Hans Ingram…" Wait, is this "one night, years earlier" or is it in the modern time?
  • Production: "Guest star Željko Ivanek had also previously appeared "Roland", an episode of The X-Files." I think there's a word missing here. Maybe 'in' between appeared and "Roland"
  • References: Does the [13] reference say that it was viewed by 6.1 millions household? I know I've had to 'cheat' and make a note on all the eighth season X-Files articles to explain my math

Those are the only issues I can find. Nit-picky stuff. On hold for seven days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 01:33, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for seeing to this one. I've addressed your concerns, adding in an explanatory note to elaborate on ref 13. Finding this latter half of the season trickier to sort out as it's not covered by any DVD features and the corresponding Genge book was a waste of time, little to no usable information in it unlike the first one; which will explain why the production information might seem a little spartan and stretched. I'm rambling here; thanks for the review. GRAPPLE X 04:18, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That stinks. Sorry to hear that. If it makes you feel better, I ordered the LAX-Files book and will make scans of it (along with the Kessenich book) ASAP/when I get it. As for this article, everything looks now. I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 05:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's good, should be handy. I saw you make some gains on Mythology of The X-Files, I'm thinking it's going to be tricky cutting all that plot down to size but it's probably better to start big and chip away. Thanks again for reviewing this one. GRAPPLE X 05:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]