Talk:Walk It Off
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Favourable/Unfavourable?
[edit]This article says both "The critical reception to the album was generally not favourable" and "the critical reception to the album was generally favourable." Which is it? User:Zhankfor
- It was vandalism - fixed now. Seraphim♥ 11:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
About notability
[edit]I don't doubt that many, many sources exist for the current content of this article. However, it is my concern that, with the current content, the subject doesn't appear notable in and of itself. The notability tag was meant to address the lack of substantial content in the article rather than the lack of sources. Unless such content can be written and sourced, this article may be deleted in the future. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:02, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- To be fair, this article has existed for less than 2 hours and as you can see, I am in the process of working hard to develop the lack of substantial content. I added the sources because I believe they assert notability to a satisfactory standard and so that someone else wouldn't come along and prod whilst I am creating content. Seraphim Whipp 16:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, I think that message was the motivation I needed :). Seraphim Whipp 19:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks awesome now. Great work. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers! :D Seraphim Whipp 01:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, looks awesome now. Great work. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, I think that message was the motivation I needed :). Seraphim Whipp 19:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)