Talk:Walk Away (Kelly Clarkson song)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kelly Clarkson Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kelly Clarkson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kelly Clarkson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kelly ClarksonWikipedia:WikiProject Kelly ClarksonTemplate:WikiProject Kelly ClarksonKelly Clarkson articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

all of her songs are great. this one is just another fine example of how singing AGAINST love can sometimes be better than singing for love.

worried

frankly, i'm worried how a 4th single in a row about heartbreak will come off to fans. I'm sure it will be a hit, but honestly, the best single to release at this time would have been "You Found Me".

Kelly Clarkson should release 'Gone' instead of 'Walk Away'.When I heard that 'Gone' was going to be released, I was predicting the song would reach the Billboard Top 10 but why must Kelly replaced it to 'Walk Away'?? Please Kelly...choose Gone for the next single.

Too bad, "Addicted" is confirmed as the next single. Actually, I prefer "Gone" too. I think "Addicted" will perform average like "Walk Away" on the charts.

btw, Walk Away was one of the four or so songs on the album I always skipped, so hopefully my that won't reflect on everyone else 207.30.196.3 03:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i liked walk away but i prefered where is your heart

I would like to say that "Walk Away" and "Since U Been Gone" aren't about heartbreak, they're about breakups, and they are not nessarcerily the same thing. And it is doing fairly well, you don't have to worry. It's personally one of my favorite songs. Bye! MorwenofLossarnarch 03:50, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clean Up

Can anyone make the 'Song Information' and 'Video' section of this page a bit more eloquent? The descriptions and sentence structure aren't very good.

I'm not saying I could do much better, but I'm sure someone can.

Updated the "Chart Position" section to reflect less speculation and increase objectivity. --Atlantawes 19:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation

I removed the link to "Addicted" in the info box, because it's unlikely that it will be a single, considering that Clarkson expressed that she hoped that "Walk Away" was the last single, since she was excited about her third album to be released. MorwenofLossarnarch 03:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about it. Kelly's new album wil be out late 2006 or early 2007. This gives her plenty of time to release Addicted. But I prefer Gone as the last single.

Could someone provide a link to where Kelly Clarkson stated "Addicted" is unlikely to be a single? --Atlantawes 14:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

#21?

I looked on the Top 75 chart, and Ordinary Boys is at #21. Walk Away is nowhere to be seen. [1] Mike H. That's hot 23:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This website identifies very clearly that "Walk Away" debuted at number twenty-one in the UK. It could be that the URL you access was running short or an update failed to appear on-screen. —Eternal Equinox | talk 14:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BDS Chart this week?

I've tried pulling it up on canoe.ca, but it's only giving a scrambled version of the US BDS Top 20. Does anyone have the Canadian version? Mike H. That's hot 08:27, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jam.canoe is currently experiencing a malfunction in their programmers, however, the single is at number eight this week. —Eternal Equinox | talk 01:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fancruft

This article seems to me to have some fancruft. Someone needs to remove it. MorwenofLossarnarch 17:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're being really vague. Can you cite examples? Mike H. That's hot 01:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

which just so happens to be Kelly's brother Jason seems, to me, to be slightly fancrufty. There are other instances. MorwenofLossarnarch 18:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Go??

If the title of this page is Walk Away (Kelly Clarkson song), then why is the page information about "Go"? And since when do we know that it will be the sixth single off her third album, anyway?--CatMan 23:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jackson

Something needs to be said for how much Kelly Clarkson sounds like Michael Jackson in this song... she's hitting the same octaves, the same inflections, or something. I wonder if it's been noted in the magazines at all. -76.4.49.201 15:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Walkaway 1.png

Image:Walkaway 1.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walk Away (Kelly Clarkson song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313200820/http://www.popfusion.net/records/recaparchive/2006_06.html to http://www.popfusion.net/records/recaparchive/2006_06.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]