Talk:Walden–Wallkill Rail Trail/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 02:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC) No disamb links or bad links.

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

I will be reviewing your article. It clearly represents a lot of work.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "The park is expected to be built once" ->"The park is expected to be developed once"

   "Congressman Maurice Hinchey announced the procurement of $351,000 to complete the project"->"Congressman Maurice Hinchey announced the appropriation of $351,000 to complete the project"

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Do you have a source for the fact that the trial is no longer named after Jesse McHugh?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Explain who Jesse McHugh was in the lead. It is too burried now.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   no edit wars.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Nice photos. Thank you for contributing them.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Placing article on hold.

Changes I don't have a source that it's no longer named after Jesse McHugh, so tweaking the wording slightly. All other changes have been completed.
--Gyrobo (talk) 04:35, 7 January 2011 (UTC) Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 06:38, 7 January 2011 (UTC)