Talk:Wait a Minute (The Pussycat Dolls song)/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
I will start this today --K. Peake 07:49, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Per the liner notes, Timbaland should be credited in his real name under songwriters
- Done
- the Pussycat Dolls → The Pussycat Dolls under singles chronology, as "the" needs capitalization when beginning this parameter
- Done
- "The song features" → "The song features a guest appearance from"
- Done
- "who produced the song and co-wrote the song with" → "who served as the sole producer and co-wrote it with"
- Done
- The release sentence should be the third of the para instead
- Done
- ""Wait a Minute" was released, as" → "The song was released as" but start this sentence with the date because the second begins with "the song"
- Done
- The sentence is not starting with the term on, also you have not changed to the song. --K. Peake 17:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- Write generally positive instead because one review was not so glowing
- Done
- "Compared to the album's previous singles, the song" → "Compared to the Pussycat Dolls' previous singles, "Wait a Minute""
- Done
- Too much commercial info is after the first sentence in the lead; only keep the United States part onwards
- Done
- "on the Billboard Hot 100. It achieved its highest positions" → "on the Billboard Hot 100, while achieving its highest positions"
- Done
- "where it peaked atop the country's" → "peaking atop the latter country's"
- Done
- Introduce as the accompanying music video instead to be more specific
- Done
- Add a part about the video synopsis
- Done
- "It was performed on" → "The song was performed on"
- Done
Background and composition
[edit]- Remove introduction to who the Pussycat Dolls are since that being in the lead is sufficient
- The debut single part does not appear to be sourced
- Remove comma before "Don't Cha"
- "and stands as group's" → "and stands as the group's"
- "Their collaboration resulted in" → "Timbaland and the group's collaboration resulted in"
- "to be included in PCD," → "to be released on PCD,"
- Remove "on the album" after included
- Remove comma after lead singer
- Pipe hip-hop to Hip hop music
- Remove comma after described as; [9] needs to be invoked again here since it sources the range
- Remove "as well" after the vocal production part since Hilson's previous contributions were mentioned a while back
- Remove wikilink on Florida
Reception
[edit]Critical
[edit]- "feeling it was" → "feeling it is"
- "standout tracks of the album." → "standout tracks of PCD." to avoid overusage of the album
- Sputnikmusic should not be italicised
- Write the staff of Popjustice for that review since attributing it to the publication is misleading
- "of a "[song] that had" → "of one "that had"
- "opined "Wait a Minute" was a" → "opined "Wait a Minute" is a"
Commercial
[edit]- "In their native country, "Wait a Minute" debuted on" → "In the Pussycat Dolls' native country of the United States, "Wait a Minute" entered"
- "number 19 and 23 on Canada CHR/Top 40 and Mainstream Top 40 respectively." → "numbers 19 and 23 on the Canada CHR/Top 40 and Mainstream Top 40 charts, respectively." with the wikilink per MOS:LINK2SECT
- "and 24 on the" → "and at number 24 on the"
- "not to enter the top ten;" → "not to enter the top 10 on either chart;" per MOS:NUM
- "New Zealand it became their" → "New Zealand, it became the group's"
- "highest peak (number three)," → "highest peak of number three," but no positions are displayed by the broken URL
- "and top 50 in" → "and reached the top 50 in"
- "becoming the group's lowest charting single in" → "becoming the Pussycat Dolls' lowest charting single on"
Release and promotion
[edit]- Shouldn't be the section before reception?
- Per MOS:US, keep the United States here if the section is moved before reception and change to the US in that section, but if not then do it the other way round
- "its accompanying music video was" → "an accompanying music video was" with the wikilink
- "in Los Angeles, California with" → "in Los Angeles, California, with"
- "performed fours songs including" → "performed fours songs, including"
- Remove wikilink on "Don't Cha"
- ""Stickwitu" and "Wait a Minute"." → ""Stickwitu", and "Wait a Minute"."
- Mention what year the new year's eve special was, also this should be italicised per the article
- "The group performed the song" → "The Pussycat Dolls performed the song"
- Remove comma before the Doll Domination Tour and mention the crowd reaction per the source
Track listing
[edit]- No track listing is displayed for the first CD single
- The album version clean listed for the 12" vinyl is the one track not mentioned by the source
Credits and personnel
[edit]- Good
Charts
[edit]Weekly charts
[edit]- No peak performance is displayed by the Finland source
Year-end charts
[edit]- Good
Certification
[edit]- Good
Release history
[edit]- Label → Label(s)
See also
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks incredible at 9.9%; ignore the flagged URL that is not used whatsoever in this article!!!!
- Make sure that American date formats are used throughout for consistency
- SongwriterUniverse.com → SongwriterUniverse on ref 2
- Wikilink MTV News on ref 3
- Remove wikilink on MTV News for ref 5
- Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 9
- Add url-access limited to ref 12
- Italicise PCD on ref 15 and cite Sputnikmusic as publisher instead
- Italicise PCD on ref 16
- Pipe Romanian Top 100 to Romanian record charts on ref 26
- Replace ref 27 by either using the correct template or citing a working/archived URL
- ChartsPlus → UKChartsPlus on ref 35
- Cite TheGATE.ca as publisher on ref 38 with the wikilink
- Cite MTV News as publisher on ref 41
- Cite Amazon.com as publisher on ref 44, piping to Amazon (company)
- Remove pipe on Amazon.de for ref 45
- Cite Amazon.com as publisher on ref 46
- Only cite Magyar Hanglemezkiadók Szövetsége under publisher on ref 51
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this has largely improved since the first review!! --K. Peake 10:22, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hey *Kyle Peake, just began editing; thanks for following up!! --MrHyacinth (talk) 03:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- MrHyacinth Thank you, you have ran through things smoothly so far besides a few points that I copyedited and one that I mentioned is still a remaining issue. --K. Peake 17:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
- ✗ Fail since it has been a month and the nominator has not even started to work on the body of this article yet. --K. Peake 10:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hey *Kyle Peake, just began editing; thanks for following up!! --MrHyacinth (talk) 03:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)