Talk:Wait-for graph

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

I removed the banner to take this article down because it was too short or whatnot and wrote up a little bit more to describe what this is, it is not a lot by any means, but i think it explains the concept well enough to justify not deleting the article. Andykonwinski (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know of an example usage/image of this? Welcor (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008-01-29 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 04:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

In some places (such as this article) the capitalized form of wait-for graphs has the F capitalized too, while in other sources it is not capitalized (such as the title of this article). The lower-case f looks better to me, but I am not sure.--CyHawk (talk) 17:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is because usually in algorithms when P sub x denotes a process, the P is capital; however, in graph theory vertices are always lowercase. In this case P is denoting both simultaneously. --voidlogic 16:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.49.242.200 (talk)

Fix the problem now

Fix the problem plain and simple simply fix the fing problem. It's driving me completely crazy. Fix it. 47.224.44.135 (talk) 02:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]