Talk:Wahpeton, North Dakota

United States: North Dakota Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Dakota portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Dakota (assessed as Mid-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

I have been adding information to this page a lot lately, so please feel free to edit the text. The source for my information is http://www.wahpeton.com, which I have included a link to on all of the sections I have edited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cman024 (talk • contribs)

Copyright?

I am highly concerned with the material that 24.220.28.54/Cman024 recently put in the article. It comes directly from two URLs: this one and this one. Although the article does mention that the material is taken from wahpeton.com, do other users find it troubling to see so much material copied word-for-word from an external website to this article? I know I do. --Matth e wUND^(talk) 09:09, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that copying word for word should be avoided, especially to the extent it is done in this article. Because if is taken directly from the city website, I think that would tend to make it non-NPOV as well. In fact, the article does seem to lack a NPOV. Statements such as "It is a community with a future", "a city that boasts the most modern medical center in the area", and "The area is a virtual paradise for the outdoorsman and hunter" do not seem to belong in an encyclopedia article. 146.23.68.24

I took at stab at trying to "neutralize" the POVWkharrisjr (talk) 20:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Sturdevant

The official website says Jim Sturdevant is the mayor. Where can I add his name? CheepnisAroma (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unwarranted Search

I removed the word "obese" as a description for officer Dustin Hill in this section. It wasn't necessary given the context of the situation. I'm sort of on the fence about the notability of the incident described here (I don't doubt it might become notable, maybe it already is, I don't know) but this section is going to need a citation. I would do it, but it's 4:40am here and I honestly don't know enough about it. I didn't want to outright delete the section though until someone else could weigh in on it. There's a video going around about this story but I don't know any other appropriate sources that cover it right now. BrainDance (talk) 08:46, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]