Talk:Wagner (film)

This article falls within the scope of the Richard Wagner WikiProject, a collaboration to develop articles on the composer and his operas. The project talk page is a place to discuss issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!Richard WagnerWikipedia:WikiProject Richard WagnerTemplate:WikiProject Richard WagnerRichard Wagner articles

Television C‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Viewpoint of the series

I would like to know whether there has been other "Wagner" TV-series. This series or the other Wagner semi-documentary showed clearly how Wagner speculated in peoples sexual inhibitions showing half naked Rhein-daughters waving transparent dresses, and that Wagners royal protector very much liked this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donald j axel (talk • contribs) 00:39, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a miniseries, according to Tony Palmer

The July 2011 Limelight article "Palmer talks Wagner", about the release of the 3-DVD set, is in the form of Q&A with Tony Palmer:

Q. So your 1982 film Wagner is finally being released in its full form on DVD ...
A. Three DVDs - 7 hours and 46 minutes. It is now exactly as it was originally filmed, as one film, not a miniseries. I'm sick and tired of hearing it described as a miniseries.

So, given that, maybe we need to change the title to Wagner (film). It's a little vexed, though, because 99% of people who've ever seen it up till now have seen a miniseries, not a film. -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 12:23, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it, and reworded the text to support this title. -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 20:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Funny. in my set of VHS, the only narrator I ever hear is john Gieldgud, (and he is credit as such); not "Andrew Cruickshank"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.103.170.224 (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, its true the Olivier, Richardson and Gieldgud only appear in the same visual frame in this film but they DO appear in the same first-temporal scene of Olivier's Richard III, that is in the same acting scene. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.103.170.224 (talk) 19:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]