Talk:Wag-Aero CUBy
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wag-Aero CUBy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Wag-Aero CUBy appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 September 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Auto fuel could not cause vapor lock
[edit]I quote "The designer of the aircraft Dick Wagoner flew the unpressurized aircraft as high as 20,000 ft (6,096 m) to demonstrate that auto fuel would not cause vapor lock." Auto fuel, per se, does not cause "vapour lock". This is generally caused by an inefficient/badly planned fuel deivery system and has nothing with the aerodynamic ability of the equipment? Werry confusing as it is! Semperlibre (talk) 09:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Because of its higher volatility, especially with summer blends of auto fuel, vapour lock at high altitudes is a distinct concern with the use of auto fuel. Since aircraft fuel delivery systems are designed around less volatile avgas there were concerns that they might be unsuitable for autofuel and this was what EAA spent most of their time examining in the studies conducted. - Ahunt (talk) 13:21, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles