Talk:WWWX
This article was nominated for deletion on 1 May 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:WWWX-FM.gif
[edit]Image:WWWX-FM.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]The article does not explain why this radio station is notable. Gamebuster19901 (Talk║Contributions) 16:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
- Because like every other FCC licensed radio station, it A) has a license B) exists in real life C) broadcasts to people, and do I really have to explain why a radio station is notable? Radio stations generally enjoy a degree of notability not the least of which because they are licensed by a government entity. I guess I fail to see how it is NOT notable? It has 17!!! references. Most radio station articles do not even have a 10th of that many. I would love to see a reason why this radio station gets singled out as not being notable. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • I DX for fun! 02:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- I've removed the notability template. I believe at this point that notability through sources is now more than evident. I could at this point continue to comb newspapers.com if need be to provide even more contemporary sources about this station; there's plenty, and if notability is still in question, I probably will until the matter is laid to rest. Skybunny (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)