Talk:WTVZ-TV

WTVZ-TV has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 15, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from WTVZ-TV appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a Virginia TV station made payroll early on by trading in car titles for cash?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WTVZ-TV.

Wikipedia

GA Review

Passed. ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:31, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:WTVZ-TV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tails Wx (talk · contribs) 22:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on this article, and I'm happy to start my second review on it! I'll review this throughout the next few days. :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 22:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
0% according to Earwig!
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

Good work on this article! I've got a few comments below:

I spotchecked nine random sources, all but one verified. The only that didn't verify was the first source in WTVZ-TV#TVX ownership, "In 1976, the Television Corporation of Virginia was formed in response to what its backers perceived as the need for another television station in the Norfolk area." The provided source doesn't mention the name of the the Television Corporation of Virginia, in which it states "Planning for WTVZ began when a group of area men decided the area was ready for a new TV station...". I don't think the source fully verifies the content in the article above.
- Fixed with an additional citation call. An odd one because the company's name is in literally every other pre-1980/81 reference.
In the same section above, "Armed with an agreement"–how about "After settling with an agreement"?
In WTVZ-TV#MyNetworkTV affiliation, "Sinclair entered into an agreement to acquire Tribune Media—which at the time was the operator of WTKR and WGNT—in 2017." – why not re-word it to "In 2017, Sinclair entered into an agreement to acquire Tribune Media—which at the time was the operator of WTKR and WGNT."?
- Above two done.
The one image in the article, File:WTVZ-TV logo.svg, does not have proper copyright or licensing information, despite being in the public domain.
- Wow, weird one here. A now-blocked user uploaded it as non-free, but it's below TOO. Fixed the tagging mismatch.

That's all I got! Courtesy ping Sammi Brie. :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:51, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tails Wx: Should have fixed the above. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:47, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sammi Brie, happy to promote! :) ~ Tails Wx (🐾, me!) 02:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 19:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that early on, a Virginia TV station made payroll by trading in car titles for cash? Source: Schapiro, Jeff E. (March 1987). "Air wolf: Tim McDonald is a broadcast animal". Virginia Business. p. 40. "In the early days at WTVZ, we made payroll by going to the bank and trading auto titles for cash," executive vice president John A. Trinder recalls in his Massachusetts patois.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jade Armor

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 06:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WTVZ-TV; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Article has achieved Good Article status. No issues of copyvio or plagiarism. All sources appear reliable. Hook is interesting and sourced. QPQ is done. Looks ready to go! Thriley (talk) 02:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]