Talk:WTTV

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

WTTV/WTHI's channels

This article says that WTTV was once on channel 10, but changed to 4. According to my grandpa, WTHI was once on 4, but right now it's on 10. Can someone confirm this? The WTHI-TV article says nothing about this. --/ɛvɪs/ /tɑːk/ /kɑntrɪbjuʃ(ə)nz/ 01:33, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

No, WTHI was never on channel 4. WTTV moved to channel 4 so it could cover Indinapolis better, and that created an open space for channel 10 in Terre Haute. WTHI did not sign on at all until a few months after WTTV moved to 4. DonutLover 00:20, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"fucking up like channel 4"

Okay, I await proof of this phrase. I've never heard it in my life, and apparently neither has the editor who tagged it before I deleted it. Lambertman 15:22, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I never, ever heard the phrase, and I lived in the area until I was almost 29 (I'm 30). I did used to use it as the epitome of poor recption, as I lived on the north side and did not have cable. Scottandrewhutchins 12:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify. You never heard it, but you used it? Lambertman 12:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no, I have never, ever used the phrase. I meant I would refer to the station as the epitome of poor picture. Scottandrewhutchins 14:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where does the phrase even come from? 161.225.129.111 15:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This phrase has a general meaning somewhere in between "all messed up" and "slipping out of line" ... it may be obscure, and only occasionally referenced - but its origins are as such:

In rural areas, before the full predominance of cable, broadcast TV had significant bleed through and interference in the 3 and 4 channel bands

VCR players originally had a switch to select channel 3 or 4 depending on the local noise

trying to actually watch one of those channels in that era was painful, sometimes it would be fine but weather and sun spots and holy wrath might suddenly result in either a partly viewable channel or one that is all out of whack

thus the phrase - It is one of those things that you just had to live through to fully unappreciate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Criley002 (talk • contribs) 02:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sammy Terry

I think he ought to get his own page. I didn't watch him much, so I wouldn't feel qualified to write it. Scottandrewhutchins 12:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wttvlogo.jpg

Image:Wttvlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of changes...

WTTV just changed logos from CW4 to Indiana's 4. Look for a logo to reflect that. (Aeverine Frathleen Nieves 00:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC))

Bob and Tom TV

WTTV is running ads saying that on July 27 they will be called "Bob and Tom TV"? Know what this is about? Gpia7r (talk) 03:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Omissions & Additions

First WTTV promoted themselfs "Indiana's oldest continuously operating television station". This was because, though they went on the air after WFBM-TV WFBM had a transmitter failure shortly after they went live and were off the air for an extended period (months?) of time while they rebuilt the transmitter. WTTV never has been off the air for any major period of time.

Second I think that the early broadcaster of the para-normal and UFO news, Frank Edwards had a TV version of his show "Stranger than Science" which was produced at WTTV. This is an old memory I would have too look into and varify. Any one else know about any of this. Corumplex (talk) 07:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 03:48, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WTTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on WTTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image change

Hey, I have no clue how to change the image on the infobox on this page. Mross6439 (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]