Talk:WPLR

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm the one who inserted the comments about their never, or almost never, playing any female artists in the article. This is not vandalism. It is accurate and it matters. The point isn't feminism but the play list of what was once a great station is crippled and shrunken because the focus groups they consult don't seem to realize that there have been so many great women in rock. 75.69.189.42 (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Will in New Haven75.69.189.42 (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That may or may not be true, but Wikipedia isn't a blog. If you can somehow cite this with a study or a chronological series of setlists... then it'd be a valid point. Right now, it's just your critique. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had the impression that a chronological series of setlists would be "original research" and not allowed. I will put one together. 75.69.189.42 (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Will in New Haven75.69.189.42 (talk) 02:30, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]