Talk:WLOO

United States: Mississippi Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Mississippi portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mississippi (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

In September, WUFX will be Jackson's My Network TV affiliate. The call letters will probably be changed from WUFX. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.214.146.60 (talk • contribs) 00:49, 24 March 2006

Please see Talk:WDBD. Morgan Wick 02:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WUFX joins My Network TV in September

WUFX will switch from FOX to become a primary My Network TV affiliate by September.

http://www.radio-info.com/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=b1505f0fcb28ffac44e1476528020fcd&topic=37621.0

employees or contractors?

I'm just passing throught cleaning up links to disambiguation pages. The link to contractor is now to Independent_contractor, but reading the paragraph it starts with employees pulled due to being shot at, but it later being safe for contractors to return. It read to me as if these were the same people. I think it just needs clarifying one way or the other. LeeG 18:29, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at this article preview, it appears that it was the tower construction crew that was shot at.

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1:108914721/Shooting+delays+WUFX+sign+on~R~(Focus+Tech+Report+1~R~4)(Brief+Article).html?refid=SEO

--Lee359 21:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Newmywufx.jpg

Image:Newmywufx.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wufx2006.jpg

Image:Wufx2006.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]