Talk:WHIH Newsfront

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Film: Comic book / Marvel Cinematic Universe / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.
	This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television: Marvel Cinematic Universe Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Image

@Adamstom.97: I personally felt that the red image used for the Civil War videos would have been a better choice. What was your reasoning for choosing the blue one? Because it was the first one? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The blue one was for the series as introduced, the red one was for the "Special Report" on the Avengers. That was my thought process really. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

True. I just felt the red one was more "neutral" as it were, since it didn't list Everhart, given she was joined by Adams for the Civil War videos. Not a big deal, just felt that was a better choice. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that thinking, but I'd stick with the blue one still. Perhaps add the red one as well, in the production section, but not instead of. - adamstom97 (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we have enough reason to per the non-free guidelines to add it elsewhere in the article. It would just be ornamental, and not provide visual aid to some type of commentary. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 05:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google is not a video production company

Google is not a production company so should not be listed as one on this page.

There is no mention of any substantive involvement from them in referenced article from Marvel's website, in fact the only reference in the article body is a partnership with Google+ to host the videos. Calling Google the production company way overstates what involvement they had, if any, in the production of these marketing videos by Marvel Studios.

OQZYwD0R (talk) 00:55, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source in question states: "we partnered with Google for a series of in-world videos from the Marvel Cinematic Universe", along with the title of the article being "Marvel & Google Take You Deeper Into the World of 'Ant-Man'". By just saying "we partnered with Google", it is not very clear what that partnership is, be it just as a place to host the videos, or actually a production partner. The prose in the lead and article are both fine, but maybe it should be removed from the infobox, since you and I both don't know the extent of the "partnership", which would be WP:OR on all our parts. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. - adamstom97 (talk) 21:21, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Canon or not canon

Does the fact that the page keeps on saying it's a "faux" news show, mean that it is not canon to the MCU? List of Marvel Cinematic Universe tie-in comics brings up the subject on whether or not the comics are canon, so it's not just a fan question. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 01:36, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By faux we mean it is pretending to be a news show. The WHIH news network doesn't actually exist. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It know it doesn't exist, obviously, but I don't know why repeated emphasis has to be put on it when it's already obvious it's not real to begin with. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is it though? The way they were released, one could believe it is in fact a real news program. It does not hurt to have the clarification. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]