Talk:WHAM (AM)

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Low-importance).

Radio Stations Low‑importance

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Should this page have their call-in phone number on it? 585-222-1180 (DeYoung9 (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

i'm questioning this paragraph "Its radio signals can be picked up quite strongly in portions of southern Ontario. This gives some Canadian listeners the ability to hear programs such as Limbaugh and Savage which Canadian stations cannot legally carry due to that country's laws and regulations against broadcast of what the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council and the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (Canada's official broadcast regulator) regard as racist, sexist or prejudicial "hate speech".

i looked at the web site of the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council and searched for Rush Limbaugh and found 5 links which i read and searched. the name Rush Limbaugh appeard once in each article, but it was not about him, and often was comparing the size of the audience vs the main content of the article. so i suggest that including CBSC as restricting the broadcast to not be factual, while restriction on Howard Stern would be factual, as this program was cited in the content of the Rush Limbaugh search links.

then i went to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's web site and searched for Rush Limbaugh in the general search as well as the comprehensive search for body text and there were no results returned.

in addition the wikipedia article on Rush Limbaugh which states that the program is not carried by any Canadian broadcast stations does not cite any governmental or regulatory restrictions on such coverage, only noting that the program is exclusively broadcast by the Premiere Radio Network division of Clear Channel Communications so they are the ones who decide which stations can carry the broadcast.

therefore, i believe that the statement in the paragraph i quoted above is inaccurate and should be edited to delete the impication that Canadian regulators have found that the Rush Limbaugh show is racist, sexist or predujicial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.182.11.227 (talk) 21:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jfjdjfjcjhhfjc 174.230.131.38 (talk) 17:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A

my my favorite song ever happened with ooôiiiuuy UGG on a planet where they were the only thing 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😞 I love e you too baby girl and I love you too and I 174.230.131.38 (talk) 17:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]