Talk:WD Lab Grown Diamonds

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Virginia: Northern Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Northern Virginia Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Online Copyright Infringement

It has come to our attention that this page describing a company producing synthetic diamonds is using our registered trademark "Washington Diamond" (Registration #4399260 -- See link: http://www.trademarkia.com/washington-diamond-85824716.html) without permission. This is infringing on our intellectual property and causing confusion with consumers by using a similar sounding name promoting a similar product online.

This page needs to be removed. Washdia (talk) 15:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If there is some sort of law suit going on, please add it to the article. The article itself is not violating any copyright (and the page you linked to refers to trademark, which is not the same thing), so while I haven't memorized wikipedia's rules, I don't see how this would be a reason to remove a page. Archdiamond (talk) 05:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published sources

This is the first time I've done an article about a company, but doesn't the self-published source here (the company website) count as acceptable under "Self-published or questionable sources as sources on themselves" ? Archdiamond (talk) 00:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, since no one has responded to this after a month, does that mean I can remove the flag from the article? Archdiamond (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Washington Diamonds is a start up, but it seems to me that the articles about them from National Jeweler, JCK magazine, and Mining.com, as well as the coverage from Mother Nature Network should demonstrate that sufficient coverage has been received from outside sources. If Wikipedia is going to have a list of synthetic diamond manufacturers, then I think that it is important to have full articles about as many of them as possible. Archdiamond (talk) 00:55, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, since no one has responded to this after a month, does that mean I can remove the flag from the article? Archdiamond (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]