Talk:WCW Bash at the Beach
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WCW Bash at the Beach article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Shaq at 1994?
[edit]I know Shaq was at the bash in 1995, was he at 1994 as well, or did someone make a mistake and put him in 1994 instead of 1995? He's not listed for 1995 for some reason.69.222.53.180 04:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Nope, he was at Bash 94 too. 90.207.110.78 (talk) 20:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BATB 94.jpg
[edit]
Image:BATB 94.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BATB 96.jpg
[edit]Image:BATB 96.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BATB 97.jpg
[edit]Image:BATB 97.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BATB 98.jpg
[edit]Image:BATB 98.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:BATB 99.jpg
[edit]Image:BATB 99.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Separate Article for BATB 2000?
[edit]Should there be a separate article for the Hogan/Russo incident in 2000? Many people have pointed to it as one of the final nails in WCW's coffin, and the ongoing controversy about what was or wasn't a work seems significant. Elliotharmon (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Bring it up at WP:PW. The goal is to eventually have an article for every PPV. WWE PPV's seem to be prioty right now, but maybe someone will do this one next. TJ Spyke 01:01, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Bash at the Beach 2017
[edit]WWE Bash at the Beach live on July 9, 2017 from Dallas, TX and it's will be a Raw Brand Pay-Per-View. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:4481:5B00:604F:E6CC:1278:CBBB (talk) 05:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oh great, just provide a reliable source now. MPJ-DK 06:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
False Information WWE is not bringing back Bash at the Beach, Trademark has expired years ago. Chip3004 (talk) 17:11, 19 May 2021 (UTC)