Talk:W. G. G. Duncan Smith

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Propose rename

Every scource I have shows that Duncan-Smith was and still is hyphenated; for accuracy and out of respect to the family the name of this article should be changed to W. G. G. Duncan-Smith. Minorhistorian (talk) 02:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have created a new article titled W. G. G. Duncan-Smith the material of which has been copied from this article. I have requested a Speedy Deletion (CSD G6 "non controversial move") of this article to avoid confusion. Minorhistorian (talk)

Oppose all official sources do not hyphenate his name and his son doesnt either. MilborneOne (talk) 19:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the article has already been moved (after only a few hours of the proposal!!) I propose moving it back unless a reliable source is available that contradicts all the official ones! MilborneOne (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cough* Mea Culpa! My apologies, I see now my scources got it wrong...errr..got carried away...*cough* Minorhistorian (talk) 04:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - moved back. MilborneOne (talk) 08:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smith or Duncan Smith?

Both are used in the article, even in the same paragraph. The father (Wilfrid Arthur Smith) was a plain Smith, not a Duncan in sight. Did something happen?

--ServeDotty (talk) 17:52, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]