Talk:Von der Decken's sifaka

Primates Mid‑importance

	Primates portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Primates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Primates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PrimatesWikipedia:WikiProject PrimatesTemplate:WikiProject PrimatesPrimate articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as Mid-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kdub828.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Should we perhaps move this article to "Decken's sifaka", the name used by Lemurs of Madagascar and given as an alternative on the IUCN Red List? It's simpler, and seems to be more common in the general literature (which is rather limited, since this species doesn't appear to be well-studied). Ucucha 23:56, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would second that. Although I would like to thank Elbstein for catching the typo in the title. – VisionHolder « talk » 01:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and a typo that goes all the way back to Eliot (1912). The discoverer, incidentally, appears to be Karl Klaus von der Decken. Ucucha 01:37, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

There are four references listed here but the article cites only one (#4). I think more information could be drawn from other sources. Kdub828 (talk) 20:14, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation Status

The side bar has its status listed as endangered but towards the bottom of the page it says it's extinct. We need to figure out if it is still around and list it properly. Also I think we should include threats to its survival. Kdub828 (talk) 20:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]