Talk:Volo's Guide to Monsters
Appearance
This page was proposed for deletion by I-82-I (talk · contribs) on 28 August 2020. It was contested by Sariel Xilo (talk · contribs) with the comment: This article cites multiple reliable secondary sources (such as Paste (magazine), Polygon (website), & The A.V. Club) |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Bad contents thing
[edit]Just seems useless, not very interesting to list chapters like that DemonDays64 (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed, a prose solution would be the best one. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:1D46:D19E:3317:46B2 (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Book cover images
[edit]how come volo's guide to monsters and Xanathars guide to everything have 5th edition images while the 3 core rulebooks do not? Pseudodragon184 (talk) 10:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Pseudodragon184: Volo's Guide to Monsters and Xanathar's... are books newly introduced in 5th edition and so far unique, while the core rulebooks exist in (at least) one version each for each edition. So currently those articles are presented with an image of the first, rather than the youngest and last version. Which I think makes some sense. Daranios (talk) 11:42, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Due to fair use rules we are not allowed to have multiple cover issues in an article, so we generally just use the earliest one available. BOZ (talk) 13:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Ahh.. that makes sense Pseudodragon184 (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2022 (UTC)