Talk:Voliminal: Inside the Nine/GA1

GA Review

"songs on the band's third studio album" - I'd prefer to use the actual album title here, so readers don't have to click the link.
Um... ref 1 publisher doesn't seem to be Musicbox?
Ref 2: Billboard needs italics and you don't need the News and Reviews thing.
What makes http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/10/133514.php, http://www.filmschoolrejects.com/dvd-reviews/dvd-review-slipknots-voliminal-inside-the-nine.php, or http://www.tunelabmusic.com/reviews/reviewid98.php "professional" reviews?
- Blogcritics is an online magazine; FilmSchoolRejects has a staff of writers going on two years; Tuenlab certainly seems to approve everything they post.
"Crahan reportedly watched and analysed all of the footage recorded for the DVD" - reportedly? He did or he didn't...
"However in contrast to Disasterpeices this DVD was intended..." - can you throw some commas in here...
"Throughout the movie whenever the band members appear unmasked, their faces are blurred, where as on the second disc, during the interviews, they are completely revealed" - I'd have thought that would belong more in the first section...
"Dawn called the DVD "an audible treat for thrash and speed metal fans", he went on to compliment.." - Dawn is the guy's name? The "he" needs clarifcation.
"Ultimate Guitar called the DVD..." - should it have italics?
- Same for Blogcritics... check all the reception section for that.

And yeah, that's about it... leave me a note when you're done. Cheers. —Giggy 12:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I got 'em all. Thanks! Black ngold29 16:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]