Talk:Vityaz (ATV)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vityaz (ATV) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Russia: Technology & engineering / Military Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

TWO (2) examples destroyed by Ukraine forces... Relevant?

FriendlyFrien and I have differing opinions on this subject, and I would politely ask that FriendlyFrien does not revert my original edit again until the wider community has spoken.

My thoughts here are simple... Does Wiki really want, or even should it...., list everything Russian military that is destroyed in the Ukraine conflict? I think we all know the answer is no to that... How long and pointless would that list be? OK, if it is something 'significant' then maybe it should be noted. And while I will make no attempt to qualify 'significant' I would suggest that 'warship' might be significant, while a mass-produced tracked cargo vehicle certainly would not be.

Further, do we (Wiki) list every armoured fighting vehicle destroyed? No..., and because we don't have a list to hand. And even if if we did have that list, would we list the two tanks destroyed on Monday, the three on Thursday, the one of Friday, and so on...? We clearly wouldn't.

Including the Vityaz destroyed is just a random piece of information that somebody came across (by accident probably) that in the big scheme of themes is just not relevant. It does not belong. Now, I could go off and quote all the relevant Wiki rules that apply here, but do I really need to?

And finally, I'd add if we start listing everything Russian that Ukraine destroys, then to be fair and non-biased (and Wiki is non-biased, right?), we need to start listing everything Russia destroys that is Ukrainian.

So, FriendlyFrien I'm throwing this open for a discussion, and will go with that.

In summation, do we think the random listing of the destruction of something that transports cargo around is significant enough to be included in Wikipedia, and to anybody that says yes to that, I ask if you're interested in searching out the details of all the other equally unimportant things that the Ukrainian's have destroyed, and when you've done that, will you then move on to listing all the Ukrainian stuff the Russian's have destroyed? Balance, fairness, completeness and all that... SurfaceAgentX2Zero (talk) 09:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize the article by removing relevant information. The fact that DT-30s are used for military purposes is quite relevant to the article about the DT-30. If the Russians destroy a Ukrainian DT-30 we should list it here as well. --FriendlyFrien (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]