Talk:Vitalant

=Comments

If my being an intern for the organization is a conflict of interest, when all I am trying to do is update the page since it has not been updated since 2010 and the sources used no longer work, then I am sorry. I am merely trying to update the information as much as possible, and being connected to the company I am able to provide much more information about the organization than is otherwise already available on the internet, as there is very limited information out there as well as on the organization's own website. Wolf5911 (talk) 01:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this page should be deleted. I originally created the UBS page. It has been updated and improved since that time. Is promotion defined as promulgation of little known facts by someone who should know? This page provides information on a relatively important (within it's industry, very important) firm. Paulshikleejr (talk) 18:34, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on United Blood Services. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150224021845/http://www.bloodsystems.org/ to http://www.bloodsystems.org/
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150227031951/http://www.unitedbloodservices.org:80/ to http://unitedbloodservices.org/
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160318114426/http://www.unitedbloodservices.org/ to http://www.unitedbloodservices.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

I fully merged Community Blood Services and partially merged Blood Centers of the Pacific. On further review, BCP contains a lot of information about Irwin Memorial, the first community blood bank in the US, that really didn't belong in the Vitalant article; the info on the research institute definitely did. The two surviving articles also have some new sourcing in them. Raymie (t • c) 18:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Proposing the merger of Blood Centers of the Pacific and Community Blood Services as former standalone brands that have been subsumed into Vitalant. (The Vitalant article itself is a bit devoid of content, so this might be useful.) Raymie (t • c) 05:13, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support”Djflem (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Keitsist (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Jolsterobertson (talk) 04:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.