Talk:Vital rates

Vital statistics (government records)

Is this article meaningfully distinct from Vital statistics (government records)? How so? Merge? FeatherPluma (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?

"If you have strong reason to suspect a violation of copyright policy and some, but not all, of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the discussion page, along with the original source, if known. If the copyright holder's permission is later obtained, the text may be restored. If all of the content of a page appears to be a copyright infringement or removing the problem text is not an option because it would render the article unreadable, check the page history; if an older non-infringing version of the page exists, you should revert the page to that version."

Will revert to an earlier non-vio version. FeatherPluma (talk) 05:26, 9 July 2012 (UTC)"[reply]

"Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/630912/vital-rates. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you." (Automatic text.) FeatherPluma (talk) 05:33, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Have reverted to earlier non-vio version. Suspect article should be merged as above, and BOTH enhanced. FeatherPluma (talk) 05:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]