Talk:Visual design elements and principles
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Visual design elements and principles page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Since the external publication copied Wikipedia rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following sources:
|
 | This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Consistency
[edit]thought this should be added. Probably needs some editing, but the concept is relevant. Thoughts?
Consistency of elements allows the reader/user to relate the element(s) in their rightful hierarchy to each other throughout the experience/interaction within the different mediums of the object.
Contested deletion
[edit]This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement unless it can be shown that the academic sites were published before the WP article. --Just plain Bill (talk) 14:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Can you show to the contrary? Dawkin Verbier (talk) 06:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Re-splitting
[edit]I split the article into Design elements and Design principles before both pages were flagged as copyvio and deleted. I now see that the copyvio investigation has concluded, and that the external pages had copied this page, rather than the other way round. I am wondering now how and whether it would be appropriate to re-split the article? Dawkin Verbier (talk) 04:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- If you want to split articles you'd need to formally make a proposal. See Talk:Democratic_Labor_Party_(historical)#Split:_To_Democratic_Labour_Party_(Australia,_1980) as an example. TarnishedPathtalk 10:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)