Talk:Visual Collaborative
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 May 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Visual Collaborative article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Technical close, move already made Mike Cline (talk) 22:33, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Ade Olufeko → Visual Collaborative — After consulting with some editors regarding content citing issues, decided to edit article submission to focus on Visual Collaborative, not Ade Olufeko. Jmilayo (talk) 02:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
Discussion
[edit]- Any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Request for comment
[edit]Do the current references on the article page such as this website serve as a good source of information about this platforms notability? JuneHazinek (talk) 12:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- The website doesn't seem 100% reliable, due to what appears as some user generated content. The link that you specifically posted above is just a discussion on an art show. The website does have a publisher however, being the African Digital Art Network. I would definitely try to find some other sources to cite to support the article where this website is used. Hope this helps. Cheers, Comatmebro ~Come at me~ 01:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- The sources overall don't seem strong for notability and the example website is as Comatmebro, describes.Pincrete (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
removal of improper content
[edit]a list of artists who exhibited at an event is generally excessive detail, unless they are actually famous. Such lists are found here only on promotional articles. If it's restored, that might indicate the need to resolve the no-consensus close by another afd. DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Visual Collaborative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.africandigitalart.com/2011/12/event-visual-grandeur-a-visual-collaborative-exhibition/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ladybrillemag.com/visual-collaborative-art-exhibition-miami-2008/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ladybrillemag.com/visual-collaborative-art-exhibition-miami-2008/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://entertainingafrica.com/2013/12/19/2face-idibia-wole-soyinka-ksa-display-visual-collaborative-maryland-usa-photos/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:00, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Adé Olufeko
[edit]Per consensus of this AFD for the same page Ade Olufeko. Astha Talk 16:38, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
I reviewed, Have three reasons to contest "Merge"
- Earlier Name "Ade Olufeko" was incorrect, so created a new article with correct name "Adé Olufeko"
- Contents improved with stronger supporting references. (Usatechnologist (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)).
- Merging a "Biography" with an "Organization", both are entirely different subject.
Can you please guide me.
- It is better if you can discuss with the involved editors. Pinging them: @CharlieEchoTango:, @Themfromspace:, @Thorncrag:, @Shearonink:, @Mnanonymous:. Thanks, Astha Talk 16:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello Astha willim, et al, supporting view of Usatechnologist I see no reason to merge article based on old consensus. They are respectively two separate articles, the olufeko article has confirmed independent sources to stand as own page. -- Mnanonymous 03:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- There were two reasons for earlier consensus to mere the article with Visual Collaborative
- Most of the References were citing Visual Collaborative (An Institute Founded by Adé Olufeko in 2006)
- There were not much independent references citing the contents of Adé Olufeko independently
Two major Changes been made
- Name of the Article corrected from "Ade Olufeko" to "Adé Olufeko"
- Independent References added (Earlier there were only 5) to support the subject, and to meet the "Notability" guideline
It would be a great help if you review the Article again, and review the merger of a "Living Biography" with an "Institute". Thank you.(Usatechnologist (talk) 13:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC))
- Pinging - @WilyD:, who seems to be an editor part of original redirect ---> discussion to verify independent references noted by editor Usatechnologist with thanks -- Mnanonymous 09:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)